Aeronautics and Space Transportation Technology
Stealth Technology Reduces Airframe Noise
Paul T. Soderman
Recent airframe noise studies at Ames Research Center and elsewhere have identified flap side-edge noise as an important component of aircraft landing noise. During aerodynamic tests of an Air Force stealth fighter design (called SHARC) in the Ames 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel, it came to our attention that stealth technology might have acoustic attributes. Specifically, the Continuous Moldline Technology (CMT) developed for SHARC eliminates flap side edges by blending the flap and wing trailing edges with a flexible material that is load bearing. This led to a 7- by 10-foot wind tunnel aeroacoustic test of a two-dimensional airfoil with a simple hinged flap with and without a CMT modification (figure 1). To investigate CMT performance, a 70-element phased microphone array technology (PMAT) acoustic system was installed in the Ames 7- by 10-Foot Wind Tunnel test section wall. The array is designed for visualization of noise sources and determination of their individual strengths. Noise radiation from the vertically mounted wing/flap model revealed a virtual elimination of the side-edge noise in the flyover direction. Because of the large noise reduction, it was necessary to recess the microphones in order to reduce flow-induced noise and increase the signal-to-noise ratio. A strong Kevlar cloth covered the recess. With this array geometry, noise levels that were 20 decibels below the wind tunnel background noise could be identified.

With the new array, it was found that the CMT flap was at least 6-8 decibels quieter than the simple hinged flap, as shown by the phased array images of figure 2. Background noise made it impossible to identify noise sources below that level. Previous work indicates that the simple hinged flap is quieter than the conventional Fowler flap used on current air transports. Hence, new aircraft designs such as the Blended Wind Body, which can operate with a simple high lift system, would benefit from the low noise of simple hinged or CMT flap systems. Aerodynamic performance data were acquired simultaneously with the acoustic data.

Point of Contact: P. Soderman
(650) 604-6675
psoderman@mail.arc.nasa.gov

  • Back To Top

  • Previous Paper

  • Return to Global Civil Aviation

  • Next Paper

  • Fig. 1. Upstream view of airfoil model with simple flap (upper white) blended to wing by CMT section. Phased microphone array is mounted on test section right wall.


    Fig. 2. Noise source images at simple flap tip (upper) eliminated by CMT flap (lower).

    Research & Technology 1999
    NASA Ames Research Center


    Overview | Global Civil Aviation
    Revolutionary Technology | Access to Space

    Site Index |Foreword
    Aero-Space Technology Enterprise
    Space Science Enterprise | Human Exploration & Development of Space Enterprise
    Earth Science Enterprise